Implications for Learning the Nature of Technology (Part 1)

The results of this investigation seem to indicate that teaching and learning about the nature of technology (NOT) may be especially difficult.  Given the deeply engrained, ubiquitous, and oftentimes “invisible” nature of technology in our society, coming to understand deep philosophical issues and critically analyze technology provides unique challenges.  Technology is perceived as a staunch friend, and critically analyzing such a friend may have emotional barriers.  That is, the deeply personal nature of technology use may hinder students’ conceptual change regarding the NOT.

While there are inherent difficulties in coming to understand the NOT, the group of preservice teachers did make great improvement in both technological trade-offs and the limited nature of technology.  While one can only speculate as to why these constructs showed such great improvement, the course activities ought to be considered.  In each of the technology projects students were expected to discuss the trade-offs, limitations and biases of the project’s technology.  This extra attention paid to these constructs could explain the more substantial improvement observed.

While the increased time/effort might explain why the participants improved upon trade-offs and limitations, the value-laden nature of technology poses a bit of an anomaly for this explanation.  That is, the participants were asked to consider the biases within their projects, but fewer students improved and two even regressed in their thinking related to the value-laden nature of technology.  This discrepancy might be explained by the more abstract nature of technological bias or even the more unsettling nature of technological bias.  Coming to understand that technology might favor some goals over others and might even “use us” is likely a very different way of thinking for most students and many students may not want to accept the notion that technology influences us in such deep ways.

—————————————-

This post is from a paper I recently presented at the Association for Science Teacher Educators. For the full paper and citations, click here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Nature of Learning, Nature of technology and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Implications for Learning the Nature of Technology (Part 1)

  1. Jerrid,

    Have you read Kevin Kelly’s (2010) What Technology Wants?

    Like

    • jerridkruse says:

      I have not, but I have read a lot about it. I remember thinking it would be right up my alley, but also thinking that he pandered a bit to the techno-enthusiast crowd too much. Perhaps he was taking a “get more bees with honey” approach. :)

      Like

      • I think you would like it. I don’t think you will agree 100% with what he says but he is definitely not a blind techno enthusiast. Very mindful to limit technologies he allows in his life to only those that he thinks will add value. Also defines technology very very broadly. Fascinating read.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s