Maintaining the Status Quo

Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology posits that technical structures constructed under a previous system, when inherited by a new system will likely result in the re-establishment of the old system.  For example, in a socialist revolution, if the technical (or organizational) structures created under capitalism are maintained, the decisions leaders are forced to make end up creating a system that looks a lot like capitalism.  This is one way to possibly explain the failure of socialist revolutions throughout history.  They assumed an instrumentalist view of technique.  That is, they believed technology to be neutral and that if they simply used the techniques in a different way, they could maintain their ideals.  What they missed is that technology is not neutral – it’s not just a matter of “how you use it”.

So, if we apply this thinking to educational change, what might be some implications?  Right now, my twitter feed is abuzz with discussion of standards-based grading because a local school district is moving in that direction and some (a vocal minority if you will) are not happy with the change. Up to this point, the SBG “movement” has been largely grass roots so the technical structures surrounding the implementation have been easily navigated by the revolutionaries because they see the incongruence and work around such issues.  However, as SBG is moved to larger scales, and implemented from the top down, organizational techniques will play a greater role in how SBG is implemented.  So, if we leave much of our system unchanged (e.g. we keep reporting A – F grades) are we doomed to simply recreate the old system with new names (as the socialists simply recreated capitalism)?  What other technical structures must we consider if we hope to create a truly new system?

Similarly, and perhaps somewhat obviously, this thinking helps to further make clear that adding technology (e.g. laptops) to a classroom does little to change the learning in that classroom unless the other technological structures change as well (e.g. pedagogy, assessment strategies).  

I wonder, is incremental change possible, or will their always be other structures that bring us right back to the way schools have always looked?  Perhaps this is why schools have such tremendous institutional momentum.

(I’m too young to be this jaded, aren’t I?)

For me, this reaffirms my belief that individual teachers matter.  If enough individuals change, then the system just might change.  However, if we try to change the system, it’s likely we are just going to recreate the old system with some new labels. 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Maintaining the Status Quo

  1. Great post, Jerrid! Absolutely agree. SBG w/o a complete redesign around the concepts of time, space, subject integration, and serious professional co-creation around educator conceptions of learning, achievement, and substantiation of learning (at least its reasonable facsimiles) makes its success dubious. A potential revolutionary change could end up as a nice bit of improvement whereby kids and teachers know a little better what a student knows and doesn’t know at any particular point in time.

    Very nicely done! Nice to connect to your thinking again,its been too long!


  2. Sydney says:

    Hello Jerrid,

    I also believe that teachers matter in the world because many of them are so skillful and filled with intelligent knowledge that can help others succeed in the world. I also agree that if we all work together as one to help change the system it can actually be a success.


  3. Larry says:

    Great post! Jerrid, thank you for sharing this. I too agree that without teachers all working together to actually change techniques much of the newer styles will not truly replace old methods. I also agree that simply having technology in the classroom is not enough, as educators we must use these tools to evolve teaching styles (Otherwise, what is the point of having these tools in the classroom?). Thanks again for sharing!


  4. Anastasia says:

    This is a very relevant topic in a time where some many changes are being made – 21st century technology, etc. I agree that teachers matter for educational changes to be successful. I am a graduate student at the University of South Alabama. I am visiting your blog this week as part of my technology class and will summarize my comments on my blog at the end of the month. Feel free to visit my blog Anastasia Martin EDM 510 Blog, my class blog EDM 510 Class Blog, or follow me on twitter @anastasia5360.


  5. Hunter Reid says:

    With everything going towards technology I also believe that this is when teachers are needed most. Students still need someone to guide them while they are in the classroom at the least even if they aren’t teaching that much anymore.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s