Teaching is Designing

Teaching is designing. If we take John Spencer’s design cycle as a starting point, consider how teachers demonstrate awareness, inquiry, research, ideation, planning, prototyping, testing and revising, and launching/marketing. For example, when a teacher is working on creating a new problem-based lesson/unit, they might first do some research on possible problems to pose (awareness/inquiry/research), start planning how to implement the problem-based lesson/unit (ideation/planning), run some ideas past a colleague (prototyping), give the problem to students in first period and make revisions before second period (testing and revising). Finally, when teachers feel they hit on something unique and/or useful they might seek to publish the activity in a journal or blog (launching and marketing).  Of course, we could argue about which aspects of teaching align to which parts of John’s design cycle, but I think we’d be missing the point.

Screen Shot 2016-03-17 at 11.33.54 AM

If teaching is designing, then we ought to be able to gain insight about how to improve our teaching by understanding how engineers and designers work. Yet, we should move forward with caution. Designers and engineers are often after efficiency. Because learning is inherently inefficient, we may want to resist the designer bias of efficiency in certain circumstances.  Furthermore, designers are often trying to make their products intuitive. That is, they want very little thought to be required to use their products. However, if we remove the thinking from learning we end up with thoughtless doing. I dangerous place indeed.

So, based on the learning I did when creating and refining a new course called “Methods of Engineering and Technological Design”, I’m going to take the next few posts to explore how design principles might inform our teaching. I hope you’ll join me.

This entry was posted in Design, Nature of technology, teacher education, Technology Education and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Teaching is Designing

  1. Liz N says:

    I’m excited to see your follow up posts about this. The majority of department chairs in my district went through a d.school crash course on the design cycle. The activity was interesting and we say correlations with education, we just haven’t take the time to pursue them further within our buildings and the district.


    • jerridkruse says:

      Awesome. I’m not going to focus too much on the design “cycle” (similar to the scientific method, their isn’t one). :-) I’m going to focus more on what I refer to as “design principles” or things designers think about to make their designs better. Hope you enjoy. Some will resonate well with your MAT.


  2. Pingback: Teaching is Design: Cultural Constraints | Teaching as Dynamic

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s